Showing posts with label innovation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label innovation. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Google and go: Information demands innovation

[caption id="attachment_1275" align="alignleft" width="120" caption="Has CERN detected a particle traveling faster than light speed? If so, it could change the world."][/caption]

A client commented wryly the other day that the Web as an informational resource is a mixed blessing. Like many other technologies, light-speed access to information has accelerated the pace of business and, much like the evolution from from courier to FedEx to fax to email and beyond, has created higher expectations all around. Ready access to information has made thorough competitive research easier... in fact, it has also made it imperative. This is how a new opportunity transforms into a baseline expectation. Everyone has the same opportunity and so doing business becomes more demanding than it was in more blissfully ignorant times.

Twenty six long years ago, when van Schouwen Associates opened its doors, competitive research (especially for smaller to mid-sized client firms whose budgets had their limits!) was typically a drawn-out and inefficient affair, depending variously on resources such as customers with opinions, loose-lipped sales reps and slyly procured sales literature and price lists. Information was often scanty and in some cases dated or seriously imprecise. But oddly, life was easier because the bar was set lower. We didn't intend that; we weren't lazy. It was just the way things worked.


The challenge today is that, with the exception of not-yet-released products that have been developed with dedicated attention to secrecy, it is possible to find out a great deal about other peoples' products and services, marketing messages, pricing, and the strengths and weaknesses of any competitor's offerings. It is often easy to reverse-engineer technical products. Why? In part because it's all on the Web.

Well, nearly all of "it" is on the Web. A frequent discussion the van Schouwen Associates team has with its clients involves what to include and what not to include in that very public forum. There are several layers of potential privacy clients can employ, including:

No privacy: Placing material out in the public arena online

Moderate privacy with potential for leakage: Offering material protected by passwords (often permission-based passwords with expiration dates and renewal requirements)... plus additional layers of security

Higher privacy but not perfectly secure, just ask Congress how leaks happen: Material that isn't put online anywhere, period.

Today, companies typically have (or should have) vast information about their competitors and their market opportunities. This is excellent.

Vast knowledge (or access to same) has also made business all the more challenging even as it presents clear new opportunities.

At vSA, we (and of course, our clients) know – more than ever before – exactly how high the bar has been set. So does anyone else who cares to look.

Result 1: Increasingly, products developed with insufficient regard to what is already on the market FAIL where once they might have succeeded. Less competitive services do the same because the customer's process of finding a better deal – the best deal – is pretty easy. Just Google and go.

Result 2: We expect that this universal access to competitive information will continue to yield impressive improvement in business innovation. Innovators and marketers have to work harder... and harder... and smarter.

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Steve Forbes says a true thing.

Speaking to The Commonwealth Club of California on August 7, 2008, Steve Forbes talks about his support for a flat income tax. I'm not sure that's such a good idea.



http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=AVtVA48kYYg&feature=user

But he also discusses what has set the U.S. apart - and allowed us to thrive economically - for the past 200 years. He says it's the secret to our future success, too.

Forbes says the U.S. is the world's innovation leader.


I agree with him. It certainly won't be paying low wages leading to low prices that will keep us afloat. It won't be manufacturing plants that resemble ant farms, with workers living, working and buying goods all in the company "village." It certainly won't be blind loyalty to our employing entities.

Just look at your teenage kids, if you have some.


(If you don't have any, why don't you stop reading this stuff and go out dancing? Take a cruise?? Celebrate life!) Okay, back to my point. The American teen is nothing if not recalcitrant. You say it, he or she argues. In the U.S., we nurture independent minds, free-thinkers, video game whizzes, kids who challenge their teachers, and sometimes young adults who will come up with ideas we've barely considered. These kids are tomorrow's innovators. As long as we remain a stubbornly independent, quick-to-question-authority people, we may well continue to lead the world in innovation.